A SECRET WEAPON FOR DUTY TO AVOID CONFLICT OF INTEREST CASE LAW

A Secret Weapon For duty to avoid conflict of interest case law

A Secret Weapon For duty to avoid conflict of interest case law

Blog Article

nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Tiny fees apply.

ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to get scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

Normally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which include Individuals in apparent violation of proven case regulation) into the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as the case is not really appealed, the decision will stand.

As a result, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has got to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this sort of an appeal hasn't however been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner might then find further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

For that foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order concerning cost. Office to prepare decree in the above terms. Read more

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight given to any reported judgment may well depend upon the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[7]

Because of this, simply citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Visualize it as calling another person to tell them you’ve found their shed phone, then telling them you live in this sort of-and-this sort of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving throughout the neighborhood endeavoring to find their phone is likely being more frustrating than it’s well worth.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling about the same variety of case.

Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, aiding you in understanding the intricacies of land and property law.

12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to the offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases uk case law search engine decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

171 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well founded now that the provision for proforma promotion is not really alien or unfamiliar to the civil servant service structure but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule seventeen, wherein it is actually lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if contented that a civil servant who was entitled to generally be promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his individual, wrongfully prevented from rendering service to your Federation/ province from the higher post, direct that these kinds of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of shell out and allowances of these kinds of higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.

Report this page